Joe Bliven

Dracula
By Bram Stoker

October 24th, 2018

I certainly understand why this book is considered a classic, especially in regard to the Horror genre. It is filled with inventively horrifying and gruesome situations. It's a definitive work in the modern lore of Vampires. Unfortunately to my taste it has too much empty space. I would say that this book has three main stories that each get their own sections of the book, that is to say they are told subsequently and not concurrently. The first story is about Johnathan Harker meeting Dracula and staying as a guest in his castle while slowly realizing that Dracula is some sort of monster from whom he needs to escape and make it back home before he is killed. The Second story is about Lucy's friends trying to save her body and soul from some unknown evil and in the process realizing it's Dracula. The next story is about hunting Dracula down and trying to kill him. Overall to review this book I would say each of the three sections is great and each section has its own thrilling climax. The problem for me is in the space between theses sections. After picking up so much steam and having a great climactic scene all of the tension dies down and we're left waiting for some event to come and trigger the next part of the book. The transition from the first section to the second is pretty smooth because we're being introduced to the full cast of characters and the setting so it's an important part and you feel like you're learning something about the players in the story. The transition into the final part of the story is horrible though. There are no new characters or really any new information at all to be introduced and yet Stoker keeps typing away. I feel like the author either didn't know how to transition into the final act and thus did it in a really boring, long, empty, tedious way or he just wanted to make the book longer for some reason without having any more content to add. After the clear end of the climax to the Second Act there are 50 pages of the protagonists twiddling their thumbs slowly deciding what to do and repeatedly interviewing Renfield, who ultimately has no real effect on anything in the plot through either his actions or words. He is a creepy and excellent character and he served a great purpose in exposing Seward to early suspicions regarding Lucy's case and overall added to the creepiness of everything but his over-involvement in the story after the second part felt tedious and circular. Also in these 50 vacant pages is allusion to the idea that now Dracula is after Mina and replaying the events of Lucy's demise, something that never occurs to any of the characters including Lucy which is a horrible oversight on the part of these characters and a really stupid writing decision on Stoker's part. Another criticism I have of the overall story is the amount of attention given to the process of collecting all of these records. The narrative is delivered as a collection of journals and letters from key players in the book and even a newspaper article or two. We as readers understand by the sheer act of reading the book that these documents were collected and don't need so much overt explanation from the characters. There was an extremely efficient entry from Mina explaining that she had typed up her and Jonathan's accounts, as some were written in short hand, to be shared with Seward. In the same scene she explained that she would spend some time listening to Seward's accounts and typing them up, she had stated earlier that she practiced stenography so this all made sense. They also acknowledge that all these accounts should be shared with everyone involved so they can be on the same footing. This brief scene was a nice effective (albeit unnecessary) explanation of how the accounts became collected and that going forward Mina would keep an interest in continuing the collection for posterity. Unfortunately it wasn't enough for Stoker and far too often the story is put on pause so one of the characters can explain how these records will be collected and maintained, and that they should even if no one believes them, and what happened to the original documents, and so on. Other than those two complaints the writing was overall engaging and the characters were great. The mood is intoxicating and terrifying.

Regarding the individual sections themselves; the first story is incredible. Jonathan Harker's account of the events in the Castle Dracula progress at a perfect pace. Stoker's depiction of a man slowly beginning to question his own sanity and approaching his own doom is amazing. The story builds a creepy atmosphere which only gets creepier. I think this first part is perfect, if the book were only this part I would give it five stars. I definitely recommend reading this book just for the first section, you can even stop where this plot line stops and it still works as it's own story. Though if you read this part you'll be drunk with curiosity over what fate will befall London after the Count's arrival and you'll have to keep reading.

The second section is the longest section of the book and is considerably slower in building the tension but it sets out to do a lot more so it's understandable. This section is told much more collaboratively and it features the accounts of many different characters who ultimately converge. My only real complaint about this section is regarding Dr. Van Helsing. He spends so much of the story basically saying "I know what's going on and I'm the only one who does but I won't tell you. Have patience though for I will tell you but not yet as you are not ready. Anyway you'll just have to trust me and do these oddly specific things that seem to have no bearing on our current situation while this girls life hangs in the balance because I'm the only one who knows what's going on and you don't." This continues for way too long and he even gives these lengthy vague monologues that are supposed to prepare Seward for the knowledge bomb he'll eventually drop on him. These monologues are mostly him listing things that seem strange and unbelievable but are actually true. It's unbearable as a reader who already understands that it's Dracula and doesn't need all of this mysterious language. It's probably really annoying for Seward too who is probably only listening to these long tedious monologues because he hopes to gain insight and then the monologue ends and he just goes "What? What does this all mean and what does it have to do with Lucy?" and Van Helsing basically says "In time you will know but right now you can not know." and they're right back where they were. This same interaction happens several times and Van Helsing doesn't even slowly give more clues each time he just delivers the same type of monologue with equally useless information. This section is overall great and the tension builds in spite of Helsing's monologues. The climax is thrilling and the end of this section is definite.

Now part three starts with 50 pages of pointless crap. I'd say the tension doesn't even start to build in this section until Mina is found in the clutches of Dracula which prompts the protagonists to finally make haste in their plot to defeat Dracula, which they should have been doing the whole time. The interviews with Renfield are an extreme waste of time. The rest of this section is mostly great. The systematic hunting down and blessing of Dracula's resting places and the chase to Transylvania to attempt to catch Dracula before he can return to the castle are very exciting. Once the characters have gotten into action the only complaint I have is with the bit of pointless transit that's documented by the characters. Harker is bored on a boat for like five pages and I was bored along with him. Every day Helsing hypnotizes Mina to see where Dracula is because they now have a spiritual connection. Every single time until the last time it's essentially the same thing "I see darkness and I hear water. I felt like I was reading the same page over and over. Otherwise the climax was phenomenal.